Monday, October 29, 2012

STOP BBC WORLD SERVICE GROOMING IRISH CHILDREN

Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’

By Ben Fellows
21st Century Wire

The Jimmy Savile paedophile ring at the centre of the BBC has taken an interesting twist this week as this journalist has come to realise that accusations of child abuse and paedophilia only extend to the deceased.

If you’re a living, breathing human being in the entertainment industry mainstream media won’t expose you. If you are a paedophile or child abuser in the entertainment industry and are famous or powerful you can breath a sigh of relief – you won’t be exposed, at least not by the Murdoch empire.

The Times may have canned the story because of a name tied to SKY.

It all started when I was contacted by Ruth Lewy from The Times newspaper on October 16, 2012.She wanted me to do an exclusive interview about my experiencesas a child actor when I had run the gauntlet of paedophiles in the entertainment industry. She wanted to “give this a great showing” but she would also “want to be the only people you speak to until it appears in print this weekend.” All I asked for in return for giving The Times an exclusive was that the story would definitely run. She agreed to the terms and said that senior Times journalist Jack Malvern would interview me and a photographer would take some pictures of me for the article, which would appear on Saturday the 20^th October 2012. So we arranged a time and a place to meet.

Jack Malvern a tall, balding ex-public school boy complete with the uniform of his generation was late to the meeting. When he did eventually arrive he had to go shopping for a new pad! When he did eventually arrive proper, he sat down in front of me at the Novotel in Greenwich and asked me specifically to name names of people who, I alleged, were suspected paedophiles or had abused me in some way while I was a minor.

For the next two hours I sat in the Novotel being interviewed intensely and having only one cup of tea. The deal was that I was happy to name alleged paedophiles and child abusers in the wider industry, based on my own experiences but the story had to run.

What was good about the article, I thought, was that The Times were going to be brave and publish the names of actual living breathing people, rather than dead people like Jimmy Savile or Wilfred Brambell. Famous and powerful people who could argue back, perhaps call me a liar or fantasist in an attempt to clear their name.

I talked about *******(Name redacted) political lobbyist Ian Greer’s office. How he gave me alcohol in an attempt to get me drunk. I explained to Jack Malvern that there was even video evidence of the incident as we’d filmed it during our “cash for questions” sting operation for The Cook Report, we had a camera in a briefcase which captured the sordid event.

I talked about a senior female BBC producer who likes to have sex with teenagers. Or I should say have sex with me when I was a teenager. I continued with a long list of names of extremely well known actors, casting directors, producers, directors, writers and executives who had all abused me or attempted to abuse me sexually while I was a child actor.

I explained to Jack Malvern of The Times, that I only ever had sexual relations with women however that didn’t stop predatory gay men from attempting to get into my pants. As a child actor you are not responsible for your actions, you’re naïve, vulnerable and quite frankly an idiot, well I was. So, saying no when powerful industry people are telling you to take drugs with the implication that if you don’t – you won’t be hanging around for long, is highly unlikely. It’s one of the oldest tricks in the book and works really on children, now add sex, money and power into the mix and you’re lucky if you don’t spend life after being a child actor in rehab and therapy – of course some do.

So, from the age of 15 I was a regular at Stringfellows, Cafe De Paris and The Atlantic Bar and Grill. I attended many celebrities parties and private functions.

One party was in a house in the New Forest and I must have been around sixteen at the time. At the party was a certain founder of a child protection charity. I was given drugs, alcohol and was propositioned by men and women all night until I ended up passed out in the garden. I eventually got a cab back to my digs in a terrible state. You’d think that for someone who is known for their charitable works protecting children she might insist that this party was for adults only and make me go home or at least keep an eye on me and stop me from drinking – recognising the fact that I looked and was very young.

For consenting adults there is nothing wrong with sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. However, I was a teenager and was being introduced to a very murky world by so called “respectable” industry figures and celebrities.

Now, none of my story seemed to be a problem for Jack Malvern when he interviewed me, he was happy to publish what I said. After the interview I even checked to see if he was happy with what I said. The only issue was that later in the day he wanted to interview my mother about an incident when I was called into a casting for a major drinks company. I gave him my mother’s telephone number, he left two messages which she ignored as she didn’t want to talk to him. My mother never agreed to talk to Jack Malvern which is what I told him when I later informed him that she didn’t want to be interviewed as she’s a very private person and it was her choice. Jack Malvern didn’t seem to think it was an issue and left me with the impression that the article would run as planned on Saturday 20th October 2012.

Of course printed here are just a few stories of the many that I told him. He’d asked for names and I’d given them to him with details only one who was there would know. He even emphathised at one point and told me that my story rang true for him as he’d experienced similar problems with predatory gay men when he was a young journalist or so he told me.

Little did I know that the next BBC person I named was the one that would stop the article from coming out. The person who I am referring to shall remain nameless in this article, however they are a new star of SKY Television. It seems that Sky have a lot invested in this person and like the BBC stopping the Jimmy SavileNewsnight programme Murdoch et al. have withdrawn an explosive article in The Times that threatened to reveal a far seedier side of their new star than they would like. Drug taking, inappropriate sexual behaviour and child abuse isn’t something the Murdoch empire want revealed.

Now, Jack Malvern of The Times may say that I’m an unreliable person or that they couldn’t corroborate the accusations I was making. But isn’t that what child abuse is all about? There are laws preventing people from making false allegations so why would I lie. In any case they said they’d run the article either with or without the names. So, why didn’t it run? My theory is that they didn’t want to give me the platform of appearing in The Times, just in case I mentioned names at a later date.

The Murdoch empire and BBC are clearly safe havens for child abusers to operate.

A society that takes the position of not believing victims, hiding the truth and protecting abusers for their own personal gain is a sad state of affairs. It is typical of a society gone mad, set up to procure children and to protect paedophiles. In other words children’s well-being comes down to simply politics. If you accuse someone of abuse and they happen to be famous or powerful then tough luck you lose. You won’t be believed, regardless of the validity of your claims by either the state or mainstream corporate media seems to be the message.

The irony is that the Murdoch empire, who has always been quick to name and shame is curiously reluctant when it comes to naming one of its own stars. It appears that the empire is only prepared to expose child abusers and paedophiles as long as it doesn’t affect its own reputation.

We’ve moved on from just phone hacking.

One of News International’s slogans on their Website is “We’re delivering more news, to more people, more often, in more ways than ever”. If the Murdoch press is willing to deny the public vital information which is in their interest to know, like exposing paedophiles and child abusers, then the question has to be – Are News International’s titles worth the paper they’re written on? Or more importantly, are the Murdochs responsible enough to run a media empire influencing millions of people all around the world.

If they’re hiding child abuse, then the answer is no.

….

*Redacted portions of this article have been removed at the request of the Cabinet Office, pending further investigation by the editor into the accuracy of the information submitted by author to 21st Century Wire.

…

RELATED STORY: BEN FELLOWS FULL INTERVIEW ON LIVE – EXPOSING BBC CHILD ABUSE

RELATED STORY: ‘No matter how Gov’t spins it, it’s a conspiracy to cover-up paedophilia and other crimes’

RELATED: ‘HE’LL FIX IT!’ SIR JIMMY WAS A CHILD ‘FIXER’ FOR THE ELITE

….

Listen to The Ben Fellows Radio Show atwww.thebenfellowsradioshow.com

About these ads

5 bloggers like this.

This entry was posted on October 22, 2012 at 2:56 am and is filed under 2012, 2012 Election, BBC, Entertainment, Free Speech, Journalism, Law, Media, money, music, UK Politics, Uncategorized, US Politics, World Bank, WORLD NEWS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, ortrackback from your own site.

53 Responses to “Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’”

Former Child Actor Is Let Down After Opening Up to Media: ‘I named names, but they’ve buried my story’ « 21st Century Wire Says:
October 22, 2012 at 3:03 am | Reply
[...] More Terror Fairy Tales: New York Federal Reserve ‘bomb’ plot created by FBI Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles & Child Abuser… [...]
moshe solomons Says:
October 22, 2012 at 8:11 am | Reply
my uncle was high up in the jewish underground, and helped arrange the visit of jimmy savile to meet menachim begin in israel, it was only afterwards i found out menachim begin was a child abuser too
- valentino45@hotmail.com Says:
  October 23, 2012 at 2:42 pm | Reply
  thank you moshe for this valuable info
  this s*** is really hitting the fan…. and there is just so much of it around!
  i believe there to be a distinct possibility with “everyone holding evidence on each other” & “watching each others backs”, iin the high echelons of the rich “N” rampantly rude, incestuous, paedophile and greedy. THEY MAY START TO JUST TEAR EACH OTHERS THROATS OUT IN DROVES!!! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK – CHANGE IS GONNA COME!!!
James Says:
October 22, 2012 at 9:03 am | Reply
I, and many others have been saying this stuff for years, I have written a booklet on it. People really need to wake up to what these people are capable of and what kind of world we are living in. The BBC are a Racist, Terrorist, Satanic and Paedophile (among many other things) organisation, working towards a one world government, controlled by them and their ilk. The sleeper must awake!!!!!!!

JW
hugsandmorehugs Says:
October 22, 2012 at 9:19 am | Reply
Thank you for telling your story, you are very brave. I am so sorry to hear what happened and want you to know that I found this even though the Times did not acknowledge it. Other people will find your story too and hopefully come forward to demand investigations and settlements. Keep talking and we will keep listening! xo
ann Says:
October 22, 2012 at 9:20 am | Reply
While I respect your investigative journo work, I am left wondering why you are not naming the very person you accuse Murdoch of protecting. I am assuming we will see it in print before long..and those of the others you came across.
John Martin Says:
October 22, 2012 at 9:46 am | Reply
The whole country needs wiped clean of Zionists Freemasons war criminals and royaltiy corrupt cops lawyers judges and the sheeple need tae switch off stupit tv progs such as x factor and soaps n wake up. These Zionist controlled politicians cut benefits from the poor and feed the war machine. On the eve of the illegal Iraq war, criminal Blair took out a D notice to prevent the Zionist controlled media from running a story aboot peedo politicians in his cabinet . It was said that if it went out , brit troops wouldnt have liked fighting for a peedo gov. I wonder if that D notice is still running .? One of the names I read in a German site mentioned was Freemason Zionist Gordon Brown.
- Antony Says:
  October 23, 2012 at 11:28 pm | Reply
  I presume you belong to the UK Jackboot party
  - john martin Says:
    October 24, 2012 at 7:41 pm
    no the party that wants to kick your fanny you stupit cunt wake up
  - John Martin Says:
    October 24, 2012 at 8:28 pm
    I take it you belong to the Zionist war criminal peedo party ya fuck wit?? Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:26 +0000 To: jm_1947@msn.com
UK GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES FOR ULTRA DUMMIES « Psalm79:9+10 Says:
October 22, 2012 at 10:02 am | Reply
[...] Note, this interview names, names. Why don`t they sue? UK MSM protects abusers. [...]
aig Says:
October 22, 2012 at 10:02 am | Reply
its ironic than ben criticises the times for not naming names and then not naming them himself.

otherwise though and with all sincerity, keep up the good work
- 21st Century Wire Says:
  October 22, 2012 at 10:18 am | Reply
  It’s all well and good to try and discredit the victim here who has stated his fear of legal and other retaliation, but you should really be asking, is The Times acting in the public interest here?
  
  What been has done here is clear – exposed the systemic corruption on all sides of media – a dirty business – which is meant to somehow ‘protect’ the public. Interesting…
  - aig Says:
    October 22, 2012 at 10:57 am
    thanks for your reply, but contrary to what you say I am not trying to discredit the author. Rather, pointing out the irony and further frustration of readers like myself. thats all.
    
    I admire what he is doing, sincerely. I do find the main premise of the article a wee bit hypocritical or ironic or whatever term you would prefer. THe point he RIGHTLY criticises the times for not naming names and then doesnt name the names himself. what would call that?
  - 21st Century Wire Says:
    October 22, 2012 at 11:03 am
    It’s clear that Fellows feels vulnerable after being burned by the Times, so it’s difficult to say what any of us would do in that situation… the legal and media might of News Corp, the BBC and other individuals involved is immense in comparison to one man. It’s a tough call either way you cut it…
Caroline Hurry Says:
October 22, 2012 at 11:11 am | Reply
Well done to you for speaking out … I believe that ultimately the truth must prevail … and hopefully a lot of heads will roll.
Carole Says:
October 22, 2012 at 11:13 am | Reply
I imagine that the writer was reluctant to name names because he is afraid of reprisals. Until this disgusting crock of shit is totally exposed for what it is there are people in high places who he may justifiably be afraid of.

I sincerely hope that out of this mess we may see emerging some truly honest investigative journalists who haven’t been “bought”.
- Ron Says:
  October 24, 2012 at 10:14 am | Reply
  He’s doubtless, too, wary/afraid of a potentially ruinous plain, old-fashioned, libel action, sexual abuse at such a remove being impossible to prove (unless there’s supporting video extant). That, too, might possibly be why the Times killed the story.
  
  Any newspaper has to run a story like this past the lawyers – who are unlikely to green-light it given the difficulty/impossibility of proving the allegations.
aig Says:
October 22, 2012 at 11:31 am | Reply
I agree. Id imagine if i was in his shoes i wouldnt do half of what he is doing. good on him.
Larry Robsoan Says:
October 22, 2012 at 11:39 am | Reply
Ben is doing an extremely important and brave thing here. This is exactly the way we have to go; investigate all the Saville connections. Ester Rantzen has connections with the suppression of investigations surrounding Holly Gregg in Scotland and Ken Clarke-well I hope this gets out. Ben is doing what the White Dragons demand. “Tell the truth” Put it out there without compromising anyone’s privacy who may be working in our interests.
cath. Says:
October 22, 2012 at 12:27 pm | Reply
I think you’ve only to go on the web to find out the person who hasn’t been named and shamed!Totally corrupt,deviant people rule this world…So why has someone blown the whistle on the BBC…Something gone on that someone has decided to blow the whistle.This will go on and on and more and more will be exposed probably in other places…The ordinary man in the Street is more honest.All I can say is that ‘Hell and Damnation’ is coming for all of these Deviants!
- Carole Says:
  October 22, 2012 at 1:27 pm | Reply
  Who is it then – give me a clue. I can’t find who the person was/is.
4LOM Says:
October 22, 2012 at 12:44 pm | Reply
Come on Ben, it’s not a game. I for one am not wanting names for the ‘scandal’ of it all but to reduce the amount of child abuse that happens in this country. The longer you are witholding his name, or their names, the longer the abuse continues. It’s a rotten stinking ship, sullied by these perverts, destroying lives and accusing innocent people. We don’t want to play a guessing game, we want to expose these dirty c*nts.
zx83b Says:
October 22, 2012 at 1:41 pm | Reply
Nice one ben, I hope you can get the names out there quickly into the public domain so you can STAY SAFE.

Dont let them Dando you bud.
Pauline Says:
October 22, 2012 at 1:49 pm | Reply
Instead of going to the papers with your story and names, wouldn’t it be much more useful to go to the police? Surely now that all the Jimmy Savile oohahh is going on the police are in much more of a listening mood. The only way to clear the scum out of the system is to have them prosecuted and behind bars. That stands much more of a chance going the way of the police right now than at any other time before.
- Harlan Leyside Says:
  October 22, 2012 at 3:55 pm | Reply
  Spot on!
onto Says:
October 22, 2012 at 3:37 pm | Reply
i once heard someone say theyd like a free parker pen, did you?
Harlan Leyside Says:
October 22, 2012 at 3:53 pm | Reply
Just another empty load of suggestive accusations. Why not name names here if you were prepared to in the Times? Have you been to the cops? Making anonymous insinuations is all too easy, and spreads distrust and fear spreads suspicion on people who may be innocent. Disgusting, cowardly and baseless.
Speak up fully or stop spreading such poison!
Youtoobling (@Youtoobling) Says:
October 22, 2012 at 3:54 pm | Reply
So, is it Armando Iannucci you’re not naming here? Or Steve Coogan? Stuart Murphy? I’m struggling to find the big name on Sky TV who used to be at the BBC? I’m interested that you’ve named Ken Clarke but not Esther Rantzen (assuming that’s the person at the party) and the others. If this was on precise legal advice, tell us here, it’d save having to rely on the Times.
Larry Says:
October 22, 2012 at 3:56 pm | Reply
“Carole Says:
Who is it then – give me a clue. I can’t find who the person was/is.”

http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/04/18/revealed-british-premier-gordon-brown-is-a-paedophile/

The guy says Norman LaMont gave him the name. Maybe Ben should contact Mike James or Neil Mackay and collaborate on an expose because the police sure aren’t up to it.
- john Says:
  October 23, 2012 at 8:53 pm | Reply
  A few BBC presenters recently moved to Sky Formula 1 coverage. Just a fact. No idea either
abi-xx Says:
October 22, 2012 at 8:03 pm | Reply
my goodness, this is shocking. it must be incredible to be so magnetic, so electrifyingly attractive that there are constant queues of famous, powerful, wealthy people just desperate to have you. it must be awesome. well done. congratulations on finding the strength to declare your irresistible self to us. i get the feeling that i should be stimulated just reading your prose.
- Anon Says:
  October 27, 2012 at 3:02 am | Reply
  Lol – my thoughts too….
Chris Neal Says:
October 22, 2012 at 11:06 pm | Reply
How many more media personalities are going to be outed as pervy pedos? It seems the BBC was rife with them! Derek McCulloch, Jeff Owen, Jimmy Savile, Chris Denning just for starters, who next?
Solomon Says:
October 22, 2012 at 11:55 pm | Reply
Keep pressing Ben, what you are attempting to do is extremely important and its only natural to be cautious under the circumstances, but the iron is white hot now! Take your story to others; papers, police, whoever, get the story out there!
God speed and good luck.
Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’ « 21st Century Wire | Real News Says:
October 23, 2012 at 5:41 am | Reply
[...] via Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’ « 21s…. [...]
She Says Says:
October 23, 2012 at 7:23 pm | Reply
Well done Ben, it took some courage, things are becoming clearer and some are not so surprising.
DR Says:
October 23, 2012 at 10:41 pm | Reply
Is Parky’s website down? What about the masterclass?
Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’ | Sovereign Independent UKSays:
October 24, 2012 at 5:15 am | Reply
[...] http://21stcenturywire.com/2012/10/22/ben-fellows-murdoch-newspaper-does-a-bbc-to-protect-pedophiles… [...]
Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Protects Pedophiles, Child Abusers’ | Publication-X Says:
October 24, 2012 at 7:58 am | Reply
[...] READ MORE [...]
delboy36 Says:
October 24, 2012 at 8:24 am | Reply
Ben Fellows has encouraged these perverts by not going to the police.
Ken Clarke, Ian Greer, Sir Michael Grylls - Stormfront Says:
October 24, 2012 at 3:46 pm | Reply
[...] [...]
Things are cooking up across the pond…. « The Shift Has Hit The Fan Says:
October 24, 2012 at 4:22 pm | Reply
[...] move in light of the scandal. But it doesn’t stop there. Ben Fellows, a former child actor has maintained that pedophilia and sexual abuse of minors is rampant in the entertainment industry. He’s even said that British Cabinet Minister Ken Clarke fondled him. In recent days, [...]
Cabinet Minister Ken Clarke – You Are Not Free To Tell The Truth | simianpress.com Says:
October 24, 2012 at 6:07 pm | Reply
[...] Murdoch Newspaper Does A BBC To Protect Paedophiles [...]
tony roma Says:
October 24, 2012 at 10:58 pm | Reply
listen you cowards you shits..
maybe mr redacted has sent a carter ruck style letter.
i doubt ben wants to have a masonic law firm making him homeless.
a bad situation all around.
armchair heroic critics.
esther rancid needs to go hide for her evil doings.
Ben Fellows - Kenneth Clarke Touched My Penis Over My Trousers Says:
October 25, 2012 at 10:11 am | Reply
[...] Murdoch Newspaper Does A BBC To Protect Paedophiles [...]
wiggins Says:
October 25, 2012 at 3:53 pm | Reply
Would the lady mentioned in the piece as a Children’s Protection Charity founder possibly be the ‘Blessed’ Esther of Rancid?
- 21st Century Wire Says:
  October 25, 2012 at 4:01 pm | Reply
  Yes, that could be the one. It seems that Childline had the inside line on children.
  
  How sick can it get.
Larry Robson Says:
October 25, 2012 at 7:40 pm | Reply
I t is necessary now above all to get the truth out without compromising the privacy of those seeking get still further facts out. This is a critical time when the public could be persuaded to accept the need for a complete reform of the system and the jailing of many members of government and opposition. In America the same is happening. Men of good will must act together across the world to bring into being a just and free society. Ben Fellows is playing his part and so must we all.
Kate Says:
October 26, 2012 at 9:36 am | Reply
I looked up upcoming Sky series ( not just on sky 1) and linked it to BBC actors. I came up with 2 actors. One of those actors is highly involved with children’s charities including children with cancer and youth theatre . I do hope it is not this one as it would ring true of saville and is too heartbreaking to imagine!!
Treasa Says:
October 26, 2012 at 7:02 pm | Reply
I’m sure you are telling the truth, but may I ask why you don’t go to the police?
Anon Says:
October 27, 2012 at 2:58 am | Reply
You were 16 years old, if you didn’t like the party you didn’t have accept an invitation to another one, and I doubt anyone was forcing you to drink, you could have refused. I got a bit plastered a good few times when I was that age to do I blame anyone else for not ‘stopping me from drinking’? No cause it was my own fault – got accept some responibilty for you own actions. Yeah it would have been more decent of them to look out for you but you were a young adult…..
Militant Libertarian » Ben Fellows Blows The Lid On Media/Political Pedophiles Says:
October 28, 2012 at 2:14 am | Reply
[...] from 21st Century Wire [...]

Saturday, October 27, 2012

MALICE IN WONDERLAND RULES

Victimized
Demoralized
Brutalized
Dehumanized
Locked down under freedom’s internment
Never convicted or even charged with a crime

In Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland the concept of punishment, justice and logic constantly change. The Irish Lewis Carroll disguises his own childhood experience of independent thought, in his time of Victorian Britain in defiance of authority, with the evolution of Alice.

Alice introduces herself with much concern about doing things right and proper resulting in considerable distress. Alice is tough on herself constantly at the beginning of Alice in Wonderland and also reprimands her cats in her adventure "Through the Looking Glass."

"Sometimes she scolded herself so severely, as to bring tears into her eyes; and once she remembered trying to box her own ears for having cheated herself, in a game of croquet." Alice struggles to obey rules, constantly changing, trying to follow the ones she believes acceptable, while rejecting in principle, those she disagrees with. She sometimes feels overwhelmed, keeping up with ever-morphing justice, in British Occupied Ireland...ahem.. Wonderland.

Alice attempts to logically analyze all of the preposterous and wacky events, that go on around her and tries to behave accordingly mirroring Lewis Carroll's own experiences in British Occupied Ireland as a child, where he refused to take British lessons, as they were commonly accepted but defied logical understanding of them, when his views breached their injustice system

His headmaster James Tate, said he was ingenious in replacing ordinary inflexions of nouns and verbs in English grammar by more exact forms of his own creation, even when he read aloud from Virgil, with a more precise term of whatever appeared to him vague.

Lewis Carroll's childhood character, of seeking logical solutions in obscure concepts, develops in Alice. In the last two chapters in Alice in Wonderland, Alice finds herself in a courtroom, where she does not understand the British logic and justice system, that the judge and jury employ to prosecute. Alice in political conscience, refuses to adhere to the British rules she finds unjust, despite being the only one who is in opposition. Lewis Carroll, also ignored the authoritarian form the English language, in favor of his own conclusions. Alice's experiences considerable adversity with illogical superiors, as is the case today with Marian Price, being interned without trial, by the Vice royal of British Occupied Ireland Theresa Villiers..

The individuals asserting power in British society, Lewis Carroll suggested, decide what things will mean. Their whims, and rule changes, prompted and enforced by irrational fury against people who want freedom, dictating responsibilities, duties, guilts, sins, and punishment such as political internment without trial. Lewis Carroll being victimized, corresponded to the Alices's view of grown-up farcical authority and with Marian Price's interned political conscience today.

Lewis Carroll, valued highly independent thought and those with the ability to rise above the imprisoned, unjust rules of would be British superiors. Alice in Wonderland is the evolving physical metaphor of Alice, asserting her beliefs, like the tortured Marian Price of today in British Occupied Ireland.

Unlike Alice who defied the queen and loudly said "Stuff and nonsense!' saying, "'Who cares for you?' as she had grown to her full size. 'You're nothing but a pack of cards!'' By being forthright and courageous with her own logic, against the queen, Alice grew in size, a metaphor of her character growth and courage.Fortunately for Alice, unlike Marian Price the queen of that time did not intern her without trial and throw away the key.

Lewis Carroll unlike today's teachers, was a teacher that fostered independent thought with one of his pupils writing, "by his own real wish to know what I was thinking Mr. Dodgson compelled me to that independence of thought I had never before tried to exercise...I felt myself able in some measure to judge for myself, to select and if need be to reject." .

Meanwhile Marian Price is still interned in British Occupied Ireland for almost 18 months, during which time neither her lawyers, or Marian have been allowed to see any of Britain's ‘alleged’ evidence.

• She has been kept in solitary confinement in a ‘male’ high security prison
• She is effectively interned without a trial, sentence, or release date.
• She has not been given any timescale for any investigation.
• She has not been allowed to see the evidence that the state claims to have
• Her release has been ordered on two occasions by judges. However, on both occasions the secretary of state has overruled those decisions.
• The secretary of state claims he has ‘revoked Marian’s license’. This is despite Marian never being released on license. She was given a Royal Pardon.
• Marian’s Royal Pardon has ‘gone missing’ from the home office (the only time in history). The secretary of state has taken the view that unless a paper copy can be located – it must be assumed that she does not have one.
• Despite no ‘license’ existing for her release from prison in 1980, it is the non-existent license that is being used to keep her in prison.
• She can only be released by Theresa Villiers the current Secretary of State responsible.

The second last time Marian appeared in court the charges against her were thrown out of court for lack of evidence by a Judge. Now the very same charges have been re-instated against Marian again by the very same Judge!

In secret courts, being introduced secretly, by the back door, through the House of Lords, by the British secret service, secret trials will take place, with secret evidence by secret witnesses, that not even her lawyers are allowed to know or see. The length of sentence is secret and it is all kept secret with the threat of a penalty of a long jail sentence, under the official Secret's Act. Not even Lewis Carroll could dream that one up.

Despite protests of defense lawyers, the secret courts will operate with virtually no rules of evidence, no discovery rules, no rules of decision and no rules regarding precedent. Not only will traditional law be in short supply, so too, will any sense, as to what interpretive practices would be followed by the 'judges' or what precedent values will exist. Thus the invocation of Lewis Carroll above, as well Kafka to the whole political/judicial system in British Occupied Ireland, demonstrating the absurd basis, of the unchecked British Vice royal regime in Ireland.

In the constant existential crises, of the nonsensical British scum state, established on the basis of a British mentored sectarian headcount, with rules and ongoing lawlessness of farcical law, that commands no respect from the informed Irish citizens, as opposed to Her majesty's bigoted or sectarian commoners, that corresponds to the topsy turvy universe of Alice in Wonderland,

British insistence on their internal logic, may amuse readers of the absurd, even as the rules they constantly re-create are illogically disjointed, in the context of the tests of history, experience and common sense. Alice‘s world is a wonderland only because, like Marian Price it is at odds with her, reader‘s, conventions of civility and expectations of basic humanity. Lewis Carroll's texts demonstrate, how an elaborate, unjust, constantly changing set of rules, that mirror the lunatic reality of a reconstituted normalcy, makes any of its keepers rationalizing it, look foolish by any standards of commonsense.

On the other hand, it definitively has a Kafkaesque basis, with its indefinite detention, where no one is formally charged, where
one may not seek counsel, where an individual cannot have his or her day in court, where, all along one is being secretly judged, by observers with a vested interest to infer guilt, based on the reasons above an its bigoted, prejudiced, sectarian, racist, perceptions.

The dehumanization of internees such as Marian Price, through the infliction of pain and torture, not only damages her body and mind, it is as Elaine Scarry wrote, world-destroying, "It is the intense pain that destroys a person‘s self and world, a destruction experienced spatially as either the contraction of the universe down to the immediate vicinity of the body or as the body swelling to fill the entire universe. Intense pain is also language destroying; as the content of one‘s world disintegrates, so the content of one‘s language disintegrates; as the self disintegrates, so that which would express and project the self is robbed of its source and its subject. Thus, physical erasure also eliminates the intelligible voice, reducing human speech to the primordial expression of pain, a state anterior to language."

In addition to these erasures of the body, mind and self, British torture achieves a third form of physical erasure, by the very fact
of the political prisoners‘ torture, requiring concealment. The retreat of torture from respectability by international standards, means that the British must perform it in hiding, primarily with censorship. However they also conceal their involvement in rendition, as they hide their activity in subcontracted assassination, with more curtains over their already, shrouded victim's bodies.

While their prolonged stress positions, as well as other conduct constituting cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment may not always rise to the level of torture, they nevertheless were found guilty of such, by the International Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg regarding their activity in Ireland. The physical erasure of British torture is self-evident, and therefore needs only brief comment.

In secret courts, with identity blacked out on their transcripts, judges will not countenance torture complaints, they will have none of this conduct, deeming it unacceptable and defendants will receive a final warning, oblivious to international law. In such courts they do not want to hear the words, such international law again. The British are not concerned about international law, they will insist on it, by having someone like Marian Price removed from the hearings, so that their secret services and military can consider classified evidence against her in secret.

If we accept the integrity of human rights law and its independence from any state sovereign, then it follows that there can never be
lawlessness such as there is in British Occupied Ireland, only gross violations of human rights law.British habeas-corpus-stripping provisions, are a core breach of human rights law, besides the many liberty concerns with regard to the Geneva Conventions. British attempts at unilateral re-interpretation of sections international law, have no constitutional rights whatsoever

British Occupied Ireland with the treatment of political internees such as Marian Price, Martin Corey and many others, has become a human-rights-free zone.The quarantine of many Irish political prisoners is a familiar concealment. When placed in a human rights context. British Occupied Ireland is often described in terms of the British government‘s denial of rights to political prisoners but equally important the denial of their Irish humanity.

British Occupied Ireland has been a laboratory, of their dehumanization, while they use their media, such as the BBC world srvice, to refer to prisoners of conscience, as terrorists, to ostracize them from what it means to be human and allow the British the physical and mental treatment of Irish political prisoners, abhorrent to human beings.Thus they accomplish through cultural erasure, through the creation of the terrorist narrative; legal erasure and physical erasure through torture.

While the dimensions of dehumanization are distinct, they are interrelated. All are connected by law and specifically by human rights.The British have created the preconditions for state power activity, so brutal, as to deprive Irish political prisoners of the ability to be human or have any human rights.They stand exposed to the violence of the British state, unmediated, unprotected by any human rights, reducing political internees to a state of bare life without humanity. What is evolving is the Irish have no right, to have rights, a vacuum enabling extreme British state violence, placing the internment of Marian Price, at the center of a struggle not just for rights, but for humanity that includes you and me.

Like Alice aspiring to overturn prevailing power relations, the value is its means, as much as its end. Through resistance, political space will open but the mere resistance, the assertion of self against state violence, is self and life-affirming. Resistance is a way of staying human. This, then, is the work that rights do, when pushed to the brink of annihilation, they provide us with a rudimentary and perhaps inadequate tool to maintain our humanity. Thus by paying particular attention to the value of human rights and arguing the importance of rights, it becomes a mode of resistance, to state violence.

Irish political prisoners themselves, have a long track record of participating in direct forms of resistance in many forms, including dirt strikes and hunger strikes, as a form of prisoner resistance, with lawyer rights-based litigation and the hunger strikes, sharing an understanding of the relationship between rights, violence, and humanity. While sometimes the resistance of lawyers and of prisoners may not be enough to win the prisoners‘ freedom, it is still essential when British state violence is so extreme, as to attempt to extinguish our humanity.

Victimized
Demoralized
Brutalized
Dehumanized
Before the sickening images can take a political toll
The right-wing spin machine plays damage control

LOVE IN A SCUM STATE

Random Official Takes It Upon Himself to Save N. Ireland from Gay Parents

by Steve Williams
October 26, 2012
8:30 am

get causes updates

Northern Ireland’s High Court has ruled that a ban on gay couples in civil partnerships adopting children is unjustifiable but, throwing out all reason and scientific evidence to the contrary, the nation’s Health Minister is to appeal the case because he thinks the ruling is “not in the best interest” of vulnerable children.

Despite the rest of the United Kingdom having legalized joint adoption for same-sex couples, Northern Ireland’s law has clung to a provision barring unmarried couples from adopting.

Mr. Justice Seamus Treacy, in what has been hailed a landmark ruling, found that the current law “unjustifiably” targets those in civil partnerships by virtue of the fact that they simply cannot marry under current law.

“Not only do they suffer the same discrimination that unmarried opposite sex couples experience when applying to adopt jointly, they also suffer unjustifiable discriminatory treatment when compared against individual members of an opposite sex couple who can apply to adopt as an individual,” the judge is quoted as saying.

“This is despite the fact that the commitment evinced by choosing to enter a civil partnership ought to be similar to marriage in indicating the security of that relationship.”

Northern Ireland’s government has defended the law, in this suit brought by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission (NIHRC), as being an overriding government concern for the best interests of child welfare.

However, Justice Treacy said he could find no basis for that contention.

The court concluded:

Adopting a child is no small undertaking. This is even more so nowadays when the profile of children who need adoptive families has changed dramatically.

[...]

A loving, permanent, stable home is infinitely preferable to growing up in care. The potential benefit to a child adopted in such circumstances is immeasurable. As well as a huge benefit to the child, these adopters also provide an invaluable service to the State. No relationship is perfect and while there are benefits to an adopted child in entering a relationship where a web of legal rights exists between the parents, that web is no guarantee of a lifelong, stable, committed relationship.

[...]

Issues relating to the sexual orientation, lifestyle, race, religion or other characteristics of the parties involved must of course be taken into account as part of the circumstances. But they cannot be allowed to prevail over what is in the best interests of the child.

The court did, however, give the government chance to appeal, and appeal Health Minister Edwin Poots has said he will do, albeit with a “heavy heart.” This is despite the fact that the ban has also been found to breach EU equality laws.

UTV Live News quotes Poots as saying he isn’t “convinced” gay couples adopting is in the best interest of the child, adding:

“The welfare of the child is the central tenet of the main body of children’s law in Northern Ireland- and this extends to adoption law. No-one has a right to adopt a child and, even when approved, prospective adoptive parents may or may not be deemed suitable to adopt a specific child – this relies solely on the best interests of that particular child being served by that arrangement.

Poots is unfortunately well known for his homophobic stances.

For instance, he has long maintained that Northern Ireland’s blanket ban on gay men donating blood should be allowed to stand despite a wealth of evidence saying that there is little substantiated risk in reducing or fully retiring the ban given the rigorous testing that is now in place.

Poots’ decision to waste yet more taxpayer money fighting joint adoption by gay couples has been slammed by local rights groups who say the court’s ruling is an important step in widening the pool of prospective parents for Northern Ireland’s population of children seeking care.

Friday, October 26, 2012

BBC Groom Tory Hearts & Minds Perverting the Course of Justice in Ireland

The former head of the civil service, Lord O’Donnell has said recently, that it was wrong for Tory ministers to shift the blame onto their officials. This follows high profile cases of Tory ministers making "fall guys" of the civil service in two rather odious matters. Lord O'Donnell said, "What I think is self defeating, is attacking their own staff," he told the BBC Today Programme.

Following the revelations that the Department for Transport, botched a mainline train contract, sticking the taxpayer with a bill running into hundreds of millions of pounds, Theresa Villiers who was moved to being Vice royal in British Occupied Ireland. The Tories, after Richard Branson who had a bid rejected creating hell, u-turned on its decision to hand the contract to First Group over Virgin Trains after discovering "significant technical flaws" in how the franchise process was dealt with. The bill for the 'mistake' could cost £300m, with £225m wiped off FirstGroup’s shares. In a time of public spending cuts it should cost Villiers her job.

The former transport minister Theresa Villiers who was moved instead in the cabinet as Northern Ireland secretary or to be politically correct, the Vice royal of British Occupied Ireland. Ms Villiers is under intense pressure, to explain how she did not spot the unfolding mess. Villiers, who was trains minister at the time, will hope her time around the cabinet table to prevent her career being derailed after just two months passed the blame to the civil service. perhaps she took advice from another Tory cabinet colleague who also shifted the blame to the civil service.

Marian Price who has been politically interned without trial, received a full royal pardon (the “Royal Prerogative of Mercy”) when she was freed in 1980 after she appeared to be on the brink of death as a result of being tortured. Owen Paterson, who was Villier's predecessor who is also accused of Perverting the Course of Justice, said at the time, the pardon “cannot be located” that it had been lost or shredded, by the civil service and that no copy exists. Peter Corrigan, Marian''s Lawyer, told a public meeting in Belfast, that this was the only time in the entire history of the Royal Prerogative of Mercy, that a pardon has gone missing. The veteran Irish human rights campaigner Mgr. Raymond Murray said that “You can draw your own conclusions.”

Swearing to "incorrect and misleading information.....would appear to fall within the concept of perverting the course of justice" as Eamonn McCann the cross community civil rights activist wrote recently.These cases of Tory ministers passing the buck or perverting the course of justice, as the case may very well be, raises very serious issues, which should be the subject of immediate and searching inquiry at a highest level.

Owen Paterson and Theresa Villiers have been involved in the political internment the traditional Irish republican Marian Price because after the pardon was shredded, they now claim, she breached the terms of a non-existent licence on which she had been released in 1980 by Royal pardon, not on licence, and that neither have the authority to overrule a Royal pardon aside the accusation of Perverting the course of of Justice.

As McCann wrote, "there are many people - by no means all of them sympathetic to Price's politics - who are quite prepared to disbelieve this.Others will find it impossible to believe that a Secretary of State could supply incorrect and misleading information in a fraught and sensitive case. But, oh yes, they could as has been proven with other previous British ministers in British Occupied Ireland.

As a previous Labour Viceroyal Peter Hain scoffed, "It wouldn't have happened anywhere else in the UK". Right enough if it happened anywhere else besides British occupied Ireland both Villiers and Paterson, would be run out of public life besides serving very lengthy prison sentences. But as Eamon wrote, "this is wild and wacky Northern Ireland, where normal rules don't apply, where due process is optional and, at the whim of a politician, where anything goes." Perhaps these Tories have been watching too much of the BBC, for far too long.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

MI5 BBC British Bugger Children Kincora Satinist Ring

Since the 1980s, the Kincora Scandal has been a taboo amongst Irish Republicans and Ulster Unionists alike; - WHY?

The reason is - both Republicans and Unionists have dirty linen, which they don't want the public to know about! The fact that the Kincora children were taken to Birr Castle in County Offaly ,(in the Irish Republic, an area controlled by the IRA) was a secret our so-called betters have tried to conceal these past 20years.
My source for this vital piece of information comes from Dr. Joan Coleman of RAINS , "Ritual Abuse Internet Networking Service" , SEE:OTTAWA RECOVERED MEMORY PAGE In a recent conversation with Dr Coleman , she confirmed to me that Colin Wallace knew about the Birr connection and that Wallace had informed a social worker of this vital fact.

NB. At some stage , I will post onto the internet all proof of correspondence from my sources which will support my information on the Kincora Scandal , the cover-up of the Rev Robert Bradford murder and the missing persons cover-ups by the RUC, Irish Police and politicians in Eire and the UK.
I much anticipated reading of Chris Moore's book , "The Kincora Scandal; political cover-up and intrigue in Ulster"; probably because it is banned for sale in the UK! I ordered it through Amazon .com ; that is the USA branch of Amazon.uk. It took at least 4 weeks to arrive and when the postman finally delivered it into my hands ,I thought that I was about to open a Pandora's Box of highly sensitive and hitherto unknown revelations involving the high and mighty in Ulster and British society! Sadly I was somewhat disappointed! I expected to read the names of many high and mighty people in British society , but alas no! Chris Moore describes very well the activities of the Born Again Christian, William McGrath but he patently fails to find out about and expose McGrath's visits to London and places outside of Belfast.He paints a sordid picture of a group of homosexuals abusing teenage boys . Kincora was much , much more than that! Who did McGrath meet in London, what was McGrath told by the his British handlers that made him a font of information . Indeed McGrath had been entrusted with very controversial information as to the direction that British and Irish politics would evolve in the future, especially around the policies of the developing European Super State! Many of McGrath's predictions have taken shape! He forecast that Unionist politicians would make decisions and take the Ulster Unionist people down roads which would have been hitherto unthinkable. When one thinks of David Trimble's political turnabout, one has to suspect that McGrath definitely had a crystal ball!

Chris describes the homosexual activities of McGrath, Mains and Semple but there was much more to the Kincora saga than just a group of homosexuals abusing teenage boys.Several things should have been investigated regarding Kincora!

(1) Have any of the boys who attended Kincora gone missing? ( Given that some of those at Kincora may not have had any relatives, there would be grounds here for concern)

(2) Was there a Satanic connection to the Kincora Scandal? (my source, who is a clergyman tells me there was!)

(3)Who were the two clergy who recommended William McGrath for the post of chief administrator at Kincora?

It should be noted , Birr Castle is the home of the 7th Earl of Rosse, who is Lord Snowden's stepbrother.(Lord Snowden is Princess Margaret's estranged husband) The castle was built in the 1600's and the 1st Earl of Rosse, Richard Parsons was one of the founder members of Irelands aristocratic Satanic cult, The Hellfire Club. Many of my cult sources inform me that Devilworship is hereditary ; handed down through the generations.
The Rocket Man Jack Parsons - related to the Birr family, was an associate of Aleister Crowley, and a prominent member of he OTO in the USA. Since the Ist Earl of Rosse in the 1600s, the Parsons family has spawned many prodigious offspring who excelled and were at the cutting edge of the sciences of astronomy, lense making, inventing the turbine engine and the development of the new concept of a solid fuel.for rockets in post the WW2 era. Werner Von Braun, the nazi rocket scientist who was brought to the USA and nutured by the Americans after WW2, said that Jack Parsons deserved most of the credit for the great advances in rocket technology for the NASA space program since the end of WW2!
Jack Parsons and the Fall Of Babalon

Jack Parsons
Simon Marsden - Leap Castle County Tipperary - Lady Rosse and the current owner Sean Ryan took a keen interest in the supernatural conditions, which exist within the castle! It seems the interest in the occult and supernatural is indeed intergenerational within the family of the Lords Rosse!
..........................................................
Thought! - I have read many books and internet articles on the beliefs and the satanic practices of the elites and their secret societies and I have noticed that there is a more than average number of people in these families who have been at the cutting edges of the sciences! They have been the great inventors through the centuries whose discoveries have effected and changed, for good or ill, the politics and the international standing (power) of many nations, especially in Europe.
I would like to make a list of the great inventors who were members of high level (upper-class) occult esoteric secret societies! Leonardo D'Avinci, Boyle, Parsons - but a few spring to mind!
Question!~ Did they get their inspiration through ritual murder! When a human being witnesses a brutal killing ( the more bloody the better, according to Aleister Crowley in his Book of the Law The Book of the Law) it changes the human mind, the brain psychically and no doubt chemically to such a degree that the human part of the mind (conscience, compassion, love, consideration) is degraded and the result is a "person" who has no feelings whatsoever, cold as a fish! However, there is a "beneficial" aspect to such mind traumas! It clears the mind of all "clutter" and the mind becomes clearer and sees the world in a new vision -
The mind is illuminated - the new man -
The Born Again Man is Illuminati!

.........................................................

Was McGrath's Tara Group used by the British MI5 and Army security for other purposes? The Tara Group was set up originally , according to McGrath , to act as a "Doomsday Resistance" organisation in the event of a British pull out of Ulster. Does this make any sense ? McGrath was being handled by the British MI5 but Tara was to resist the British and Irish in the event of a British pull out! It does not add up!
McGrath was supposedly opposed by the UVF and one of their suporters , Roy Garland tipped off the police about McGrath's homosexual activities at Kincora. However the question has to be asked; who were and are the real servants of the British MI5 and Conservative Party? Was it McGrath , or was it really the UVF?

Above: Colin Wallace (second from right) in the company of PM Ted Heath and high ranking military personel . Colin Wallace was described as a "potential" high flier and he rubbed shoulders with the rich and influencial in British military and political circles in the 1970s and 1980s.
Colin Wallace worked for British Military Intelligence , Misinformation and Psyops Dept , in the 1970s . Wallace was ordered by his superiors to investigate the Kincora Boys Home in east Belfast and the behaviour of William McGrath and the other staff members. The abusers were described in Chris Moore's and Paul Foot's books as homosexuals but there are others who would prefer to use the words "child abuse" when it comes to describing the activities of those involved in the Kincora Case. The names McGrath , Semple and Mains are widely known but it has become obvious that there are other names of powerful and well-known people who have connections with the Kincora saga and whose identities the so-called authorities have tried to keep secret since the scandal broke . One such person who has been reported to have visited Kincora is Ted Heath , the former Conservative MP and British PM.
Ref: IMF- Ted Heath visits Kincora!
Then theres this!

The Lord Louis Mountbatten - In the book ":War of the Windsors" by Lynn Picjnett, Clive Prince and Stephen Prior -
- claims Mountbatten was involved in the Kincora child abuse scandal!
http://www.picknettprince.com/books/warofthewindsors/windsors.htm
Most of our supposedly ancient superstitions are no older than my patio doors -Times Online
UK Indymedia - Lord Mountbatten linked to Kincora child abuse ring
This ties in with my information from my source Dr Joan Coleman - (See above) - Mountbatten was related to the Parsons family - the Earls of Rosse at Birr Castle County Offaly.
.....................
Another name is that of John McKeague , a well known homosexual and a member of a protestant paramilitary group called The Red Hand Commandos . McKeague was associated with McGrath and TARA but there is little mention of McKeague's connections to Kincora and whether or not he was a visitor to the boys home . There obviously was a connection , as out-lined on page 142 in Paul Foot's book , "Who framed Colin Wallace". Foot says that there was a connection between the murder of a ten year old boy called Brian McDermott in 1973 and John McKeague . It was believed that there were sexual and witchcraft connections to the murder of Brian McDermott whose body was dismembered and then burnt before being thrown into the River Lagan .

The 1973 murder of Brian McDermott.
Innocent 10 year-old Brian McDermott ;
may his killers be sent to hell where they so obviously belong!
"Disappeared off the face of the earth!"
Irelands most controversial book!
More controversial than "Who framed Colin Wallace"by Paul Foot!
More controversial than "The Kincora Scandal" by Chris Moore!
Mc Keague was arrested in 1973 for paramilitary activities and he boasted from prison at that time that he would not be prosecuted because "he knows too much about some people"! McKeague was later killed in very unusual circumstances and when one considers the boast which he made when he was in prison, one begins to consider the possibility that there was indeed a "witchcraft" connection to Kincora and powerful people connected to it. One begins to consider the possibility that McKeague was silenced because he knew too much about the activities of powerful people! My own testimony relating to the murder of Rev Robert Bradford bears strong similarities . Rev Roy Magee ,( whom I have on audio tape) , told me that Rev Bradford was murdered because he found out about "the activities of the rich and powerful "in Ulster loyalist circles.
Read "The Story of Jacque" on this site! The Story of Jacque
Foot does not go into much detail on the subject of witchcraft involvement in Ulster and brushes aside the allegations of satanic ritual murder in the case of Brian McDermott and explains it as a case of an "individual sadist" taking his pleasure with an innocent boy. He also says that in Wallace's own admission , he , Colin Wallace and members of the Psyops group based in Lisburn were responsible for planting witchcraft paraphernalia in various locations around Ulster to give the impression that devil worshippers were active in the areas. This was , according to Foot , a deliberate rouse at classic disinformation to discredit Republicans . When one considers the locations of the "witchy" sites where animals were discovered skinned and dismembered , one wonders if the Repubican excuse was a valid one. The sites were located in Antrim town , a largely loyalist town and in Coleraine , another loyalist town. Recently , Rev Roy Magee told me that animals, which had been used in a satanic ritual , were found at the Tower near Newtownards in County Down , another loyalist area. Foot has either missed the real plot and the true reasons for the enormous cover-up in the Kincora case or he has deliberately and purposely discounted and denigrated the satanic allegations , reducing them to the level of fairy tale and "those things dont really happen" scenarios!
No one wants to talk about Kincora anymore , and it is exceptionally difficult to get new information on this British taboo subject published in the press . There can be no doubt whatsoever ; the truth of the Kincora Boys Home has been suppressed by powerful people in Ulster and in London but there is also a deafening silence coming from the Republicans ( the IRA activists and those who determine their policy in the Republic ) on this very subject.
It is my contention that when the truth becomes known about what happened at Kincora , to Brian McDermott and possibly other children in this case , it will clearly show that both British and Republican communities are deeply involved in the practice of witchcraft , SRAbuse and devil worship involving human sacrifice!

"Who Framed Colin Wallace", by Paul Foot

Kincora and the UVF connection:

The Born again Christians

At the same time that McGrath was abusing teenage boys at Kincora, the greater atrocity of The Shankill Butcher Murders was unfolding.In May 1977,Gerard McLaverty was abducted by the UVF Butcher Gang on the Cliftonville Road, Belfast.

This is a very important point: "McLaverty claimed that the UVF Butchers said that , quote ,"they were from the RUC"! Unquote. This should be kept in mind when one explores fully the implications of the Kincora Scandal and The Shankill Butcher Murders!!

McLaverty was taken to an unused doctors surgery on the Shankill Road , where both his wrists were slit longwise ! Why? McLaverty's blood was drained from him. ? Why was McLaverty not butchered in the fashion of previous victims? Is it possible that they wanted the blood only to be used in a Black Mass?

When the UVF Shankill Butchers thought that Mc:Laverty was dead , they dumped his body in an alleyway.Unfortunately for the UVF Butchers , McLaverty was not dead. Barely alive he was found later and taken to hospital where he stayed for six days in intensive care. When he recovered , he identified 8 members of The UVF Shankill Butcher Gang and they were arrested later.

One of those arrested was Bobby (Basher) Bates, who was to supposedly hear Gods word and become a Born Again Christian. The question I would like to ask is; was Bates a Born Again Christian before he was caught? I say that he was!!!!

Basher Bates was murdered himself by another loyalist , the son of one of Bates's victims in later years.

In Martin Dillon's book "The Shankill Butchers", he points out that the same RUC detectives were responsible for the coverup of certain documents relating to the investigations into both the Kincora Case and in the Shankill Butcher murders cases!
Black Magic and Dirty Tricks

Satanists, the Gentry and the Freemasons.

Human sacrifice has been a terrible reality for possibly as long as man has existed on this world! The upper classes have brainwashed the naive and gullible masses into believing that these sort of things only happen in books and myths. History shows us that the aristocracy , especially those with old Norman roots, have been the pioneers and subsequently those with the greatest knowledge in the studies of these dark arts and forbidden knowledge! The old Norman Knights Templars, are believed to have been aristocratic devilworshippers. The Templars went to the Holy lands during the Crusades wars between the European Christians and the Saracens to search for "The Arch of the Covenent". They believed that the Arch held magical powers and those who had possession of it would be the recipients of great power and knowledge. In the middle ages , the Templars were seen as heretics and worshippers of the devil and were persecuted by the Spanish Inquisition and were bannished from most European countries for the exception of Portugal and Scotland. It is believed that the Knights Templars resurfaced in Scotland in its new guise of the Freemasons. In later years many prominent Lords and gentry , again descendents of the old Norman aristocracy, became leading figures in the Freemasons! One prime example was; in 1725 ,Richard Parsons , 1st Earl of Rosse was Grand Master of Ireland's Freemasons . At the same instance , Richard Parsons was also one of the founder members of Ireland's aristocratic Satanist cult , The Hellfire Club! Co-incidence?? I don't think so!!!!

Kincora Scandal by Chris Moore

Irish Time

Monday, October 29, 2012

STOP BBC WORLD SERVICE GROOMING IRISH CHILDREN

Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’

53 Responses to “Ben Fellows: ‘Murdoch Newspaper Does a ‘BBC’ to Protect Pedophiles and Child Abusers’”